Wall Street Wonderland

The good, the bad and the unspeakably ugly and everything in between, so help us!

Thursday, June 28, 2007

Well,well, well: Microsoft puts own software to the test

Microsoft has signed up a key beta tester for the next generation of its server operating system: itself. In recent weeks, the company has switched 79 of 80 servers that power Microsoft.com over to Windows Server 2008, a new version of its server operating system still in testing. The company is intentionally leaving one box to run the existing server OS, Windows Server 2003, so it can compare versions.

"To deploy a new operating system and new Web server into an environment like this without compromising performance or reliability is quite a feat," Microsoft Technical Product Manager Eric Woersching said on his blog.

For those really interested in how Microsoft went about this, the company posted a 38-minute video with Woersching talking to two of Microsoft.com's operations managers.

Microsoft released a third beta of the software in April and this week offered technical beta testers an updated test version. The company has said it aims to finalize the code this year, though a formal launch of the product may not come until next year.

Web server tracking firm Netcraft spotted the Microsoft.com switchover earlier this week. The firm said, by its count, that there are already around 2,600 sites being powered by Windows Server 2008.

"Whilst some of the servers running Windows Server 2008 are at Microsoft itself, the majority are not," Netcraft said in a posting on its Web site. It noted that Microsoft has a "Go Live" program that allows Web sites to use the beta software in a production Web site.

Despite the advance start, Netcraft said it doesn't expect Windows Server 2008 to become the standard for Web sites all that quickly.

"It took several years for the installed base of Windows Server 2003 to overtake Windows 2000, and there are still some 5 million sites running on Windows 2000 even today," Netcraft said.

http://www.nytimes.com/cnet/CNET_2100-1016_3-6193843.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home